Volume Three, Number 2                                             What ElseYou Need To Know                               September 25, 2003

 

Opportunist capitalists come by their bad reputation the old fashioned way, they earn it.


In Pleasanton homebuilders and developers are a part of the opportunist group. Try as we might to move them into sainthood, they are simply cannot help themselves in pursuit of profits.

The latest evidence that our friends in the building industry are motivated by greed and not by core values, beliefs, and principle comes in the form of a meet Mayor Tom Pico breakfast organized to raise campaign funds for Mr. Pico’s run for the state Assembly.

Over the years, builders could always be counted on to support Mr. Pico’s opponents and before him opponents of ex-mayor Ben Tarver. Now they are lying down with the enemy. Their rationalization is that the devil you know is better than the devil you don’t. The real issue may be, however, that Mr. Pico supports the most profitable type of homebuilding and builders see an opportunity to promote, statewide, gated communities like Pleasanton has become.

What disappoints is that they believe that, in exchange for campaign funds, Mr. Pico will give them more access in the Assembly than he has as a Pleasanton counselor and mayor.
One thing that can be said for Mr. Pico is that he is consistent. He abhors development especially the kind that benefits non-elites.


Our editors are researching the school board election. Questionnaires have been mailed to all eight candidates…We are following up on Pleasanton’s gateways—sewer plant at the intersection of I-680 and I-580; the gravel pits and railroad yard at the intersection of Bernal Avenue and Stanley Boulevard; the fast-food stop, car wash, and gas station at Bernal and Valley avenues…Our public library has porn filters. Do they work?…Twenty seven hundred forty seven trees. Twenty seven hundred forty eight trees. Twenty seven hundred forty nine trees and counting…

 

Feature Opinion  



Where the deer and the antelope play

Former Planning Commissioner Jon Harvey has recently publicly commended Counselor Jennifer Hosterman for her state and federal environmental work. (The deer and the antelope cutouts at the corner of Bernal Avenue and First Street are not what Mr. Harvey is talking about). Plus, Ms. Hosterman is a city councilman.

The Hosterman accomplishments Mr. Harvey points out are extremist. Ms. Hosterman is one of those watermelons who feel that: four legs good, two legs bad. Loggers are bad, hikers good. Recreation is good, commerce bad.

Just what the devil is the Open Space Account Committee and who sits on it and what is its mission? What exactly is an organization that appropriates funds for habitat protection? From top to bottom—state legislatures, county boards of supervisors and city councils—appropriate funds. Committees such as the Open Space Account Committee to mitigate development extort money. For that matter, so do city councils.

Depending on what carbon dating service you believe, the earth has been sustaining itself for billions, millions, thousands of years. Ms. Hosterman will make very little difference in the long haul.

Her goals and accomplishments are not even supported by fact and sound science. She is a pop-culture product who has bought in to fad science, eco fraud, and anti capitalism.
The Spotted Owl chased out of forests in the Northwest found a home in a K-Mart sign. The caribou chased away from the Alaska Pipeline construction returned to the finished pipeline for warmth. Occasionally there are too many deer on our own Angel Island and too many wolves on Wyoming grazing land. Some extinct species are better extinct. Fuel cell cars would not hold up to a T-rex assault.

Ms. Hosterman’s “man needs earth, earth does not need man” pointed out by Mr. Harvey, is a perfect example of how environmental extremists are hurting Pleasanton. Ms. Hosterman is spending time on the state’s land grab, Sierra Club trips to lobby, and the formation of committees and commissions that siphon off staff time and budget and overlap (or should) with the work of our professional staff.

It is apparent that from Mr. Harvey’s letter that he too buys into the new Green agenda.

Of course, many (who remain silent) would prefer that: Stoneridge Drive connect to El Charro; IKEA build on a perfectly suited piece of Pleasanton property and shoot $1 million in sales tax revenue into Pleasanton city coffers; build a $15 million golf course for $15 million and not $35 million; build ACE facilities in a mass-transit village with other governmental and quasi governmental buildings on the Bernal property; get a flood-control program in place; find a way to help PeopleSoft have a soft landing so as not add to our already too high commercial vacancy rate; realign West Las Positas Boulevard at I-680 to four lanes and convert interchange land into a park; finally, reexamine Pleasanton’s role in providing subsidized housing for the middle class and not providing enough subsidized housing for seniors.

News Opinion

Ayala, Brozosky wave the cape at the ACE train

Sure, build a train station in the most remote part of town, requiring miles of automobile commuting on freeways and city streets to reach, and they will come.

Or, so think counselors Kay Ayala and Steve Brozosky.

Ms. Ayala thinks that the ACE train station on Bernal should be scuttled in favor of a station on Stanley Boulevard near the gravel quarries and the water slides. Mr. Brozosky agrees and now thinks it would also be nice to have a transit center.

Both lived briefly in fantasyland just like anyone who thought that ACE could be moved near the current BART station in the Hacienda Business Park.

It is a four-mile drive from Sunol Boulevard and I-680 to the gravel pits. It is a five-mile drive from I-580, over city streets, to the gravel pits. The El Charro interchange road dead-ends only a mile from Stanley but El Charro’s completion is on the environmental extremist hit list. BART at that site on the east side, or any site, is 20 Red-Legged Frog years away at best (“we do things slowly in Pleasanton.”) Because of that, riders in Ruby Hills will not be holding their breath. What is more, BART has a better chance of running a line south to San Jose, stopping at a Bernal ACE station, than it does going to Livermore in any direction. And should BART go south and replace ACE service, we would already have our station in place.

On the Bernal property, the ACE station would be close to downtown, less than a mile from the intersection of I-680 and Sunol Boulevard, near the Alameda County Fairgrounds, short walk away from eight four-story office buildings proposed on the Bernal property, the Koll Center just north of the proposed office park, and just down the hill from Applied BioSystems and their 2600-car parking lot. The only thing missing from the Bernal site is a grand vision in the council chambers and a backbone to make it work.

We are, however, getting closer to a comprehensive plan for Bernal. This new idea and that new idea fit the framework proposed more than two years ago during the race for mayor. That proposal outlined a Civic Center complex that includes a transit village with the ACE station its centerpiece, senior housing, a new City Hall and library, and conference and cultural arts facilities. And, it all works in a park-like setting to meet the desire to keep much of Bernal green and pedestrian friendly. It is not immaterial that all of these facilities can share the same infrastructure—roads, sewer, water, electricity, storm drainage, and most importantly, parking. Likewise, it is not immaterial that some of these uses are income producing.

This approach to ACE (and our civic center needs) makes sense for financing as well. Grants for transportation facilities and cultural arts facilities could be combined with government and private funds to make such a project possible and much more likely than building such facilities in several far-flung locations throughout the city. What’s more, the EIR for the project will point out that the Red-Legged Frog habitat can be mitigated with the ornithological sanctuary for odd birds (City Hall) saving the city from buying more parkland in the East Bay Regional Parks.

The commitment to transportation and to clean air cannot stop with ridership studies as Ms. Ayala has implied on several occasions. ACE service helps with air quality by keeping cars off the freeways. ACE helps with traffic gridlock on the freeways and city streets.

Quick Opinion

Sense of the council votes needed for a variety of issues

If Planning Commissioner Matt Sullivan, the Library Commission and the City Council are correct (Sullivan letter to Pleasanton Weekly July 25) here are some additional state and national issues in addition to the U. S. Patriot Act that must be heard at the Pleasanton City Council:

            Congressman George Radanovich’s Yosemite bill opening the National Park to more campers and day-use visitors

            Drilling in the small, remote patch of the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge

            Congressman Richard Pombo’s proposed Interstate freeway from I-5 in Tracy to US101 in San Jose

            A new bayside runway at San Francisco International Airport

            Removal of the Sierra Club (High Occupancy Vehicle or Diamond) lanes from I-580 plans and reassigning these special-interest lanes
            to general traffic on I-680 from San Jose to Walnut Creek

            Restoring the original intent of the Environmental Protection Act and do away with habitat preservation especially for species that never
            inhabited certain areas or no longer inhabit certain areas

            With so many stock options, 401k’s, and death tax penalty taxpayers in Pleasanton, make the capital gains tax cuts permanent

            Encourage the Big Three automakers to up-size their fleet of vehicles into SUV size vehicles to make them safer


Just a side note. Mr. Sullivan asked in his Weekly letter what would happen if the Council hosted a council meeting and no one came. That is what happens now. Depending on the issue, there is between 10 to 50 people at council meetings and the two or three newspaper reporters watching on TV. That is hardly a huge attendance figure.

Chamber of Commerce sticks its toe into the General Plan pool

S ince the city has uncharacteristically shut out citizen participation in the General Plan updating process, the Chamber of Commerce, in an effort to stem the anti-business tide in Pleasanton, has undertaken a state-of-the-city study.

The effort will have little impact on the city General Plan update if the update is completed during this council term. Mayor Tom Pico and counselors Ayala, Hosterman, and Brozosky are not business friendly. Mr. Pico and Ms. Ayala are running in next year’s election and might move from the extreme left to the center in hopes of capturing squishy middle votes. That will only happen, however, if the General Plan is close to adoption.

The Chamber of Commerce has made it clear that it likes the current transportation and traffic circulation plan and would likely support completing the city’s planned street network. This is probably the reason the council has decided to update the General Plan itself. It abhors the idea of finishing some of the projects including the West Las Positas overcrossing at I-680 and the extension of Stoneridge Drive to El Charro. Eliminate the rabble from the discussion and, under the radar, kill those two projects.

There is little fear that the professional staff will have any problems convincing the small cadre of concerned citizens that killing those two projects is the correct thing to do. Only a small handful of city influencers show up to the meetings and a majority support spiking the projects. If the Chamber is to have any influence with this council and the process, it must create a pro-business stir at the first informational meeting, workshop, or whatever the council calls it. A dust-up may derail the railroad job currently in the making. Unlike the citizens’ committee that studied uses for the Bernal property, the Chamber need not worry about being dissolved for positing plans contrary to council preconceived plans.

We commend the Chamber for its effort. We suggest that they tackle the sticky issues of the ACE station as a part of a transit center on Bernal; City Hall and other civic center structures including the library, a community theater and convention complex on Bernal; and parking and retail where the current city hall stands.

 

Guest Opinion

Would it not be better to shape conservationists rather than Greens in our elementary schools?

 

Editor:

Wrong for the students across the nation to be wearing “Go Green” tee shirts, book covers, and policing parents with the “Go Green” guidebook. Kris Weaver
e-mailed I was the ONLY person in the system that made a political connection. So we have either ignorant or cowardly parents, teachers, and community. So everyone in the system is so semantically challenged none could come up with an initiative name, or student chant other than “Go Green.” And, our Pleasanton PTA has spread this nationally. In five years all the naïve 18-year-olds will register Green. Must be good, right?

Judy Symcox
Pleasanton

 

 

-30-

Copyright © 2003 Opinion Pleasanton. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Legal Stuff
All images on this site are copyrighted by N.E.W.Graphics, with the exception of some altered public domain graphics and varous business logos belonging to local businesses who support Opinion Pleasanton. No graphic located on this site may be altered, sold, or put into any collection without written confirmation from N.E.W. Productions. No article, poll, or visitor comment may be altered or reprinted on another website or news article without the express written permission of the Opinion Pleasanton edtors,Bob Cordtz and James Jordan. To do so may result in legal action. For more information on copyright laws and protections click here.